Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22410 (AP)

Yadavalli Prardhana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/14645/2019 · 2025-09-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010314982019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14645/2019 Between: 1. YADAVALLI PRARDHANA, , S/O. APPAIAH, AGED 70, R/O. DOOR NO. 7-54, SUDDAGUNTALA STREET, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. YADAVALLI KISHORE BABU,, S/O. PRARDHANA, AGED 43, R/O. DOOR NO. 7-54, SUDDAGUNTALA STREET, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. YADAVALLI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. PRARDHANA, AGED 40, R/O. DOOR NO. 7-54, SUDDAGUNTALA STREET, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER C I, PIDUGURALLA URBAN POLICE STATION, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SURENDRA BABU, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PIDUGURALLA URBAN POLICE STATION, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling us to attend the police station, unless our presence is required for any cognizable offence and without written intimation and compel us to convey my properties in favor of the said Yaragani Punna Rao and Pachamalla Venkateswarlu @ Konda, is illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3rd respondent police not to call the petitioners to attend the police station without written intimation and unless their presence is required for any cognizable offence, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14645 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14645 of 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 PSA