IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 12830/2025 Decided on: 08.08.2025 Himanshu & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Suresh Saini, Advocate vice Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representations to the competent authority for the redresssal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 representations within two weeks from today. In case, such representations are so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner(s). 4. This writ petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 08th August, 2025(rohit)