Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 224079 (MAD)

BAGAR ALI v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/29395/2025 · 2025-10-29

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 Bagar Ali ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D. Nagapattinam Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District. ... Respondent (Crime No.01 of 2022) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 486(1) (b) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to modify the condition imposed in Para No.7(1) the accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (Blood Surety and Government Employee in Mayiladuthurai Jurisdiction Surety) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of this Court of the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2506 of 2025, dated 25.09.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Elumalai For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to modify the condition imposed in Para No.7(1) the accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (Blood Surety and Government Employee in Mayiladuthurai Jurisdiction Surety) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of this Court of the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2506 of 2025, dated 25.09.2025. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 2.The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Mayiladuthurai while granting bail to the petitioner in C.M.P.No.2506 of 2025 dated 25.09.2025, imposed the condition in Para 7 (1) as follows: “The accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (Blood Surety and Government Employee in Mayiladuthurai Jurisdiction Surety) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of this Court.” 3.This Court is of the view that directing the petitioner to execute a Government employee as surety is onerous one and it is a settled law that the bail condition shall not be onerous and it must be reasonable. In this case, asking the accused, who was in custody, to ask him to produce government employee as surety is not necessary. Hence, I am inclined to modify the same as follows: “The accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mayiladuthurai”. The other conditions imposed by the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.2506 of 2025 dated 25.09.2025 shall remain intact. 4. With the above modification, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. 29.10.2025 ssi 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D. Nagapattinam Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. ssi Crl.O.P.No.29395 of 2025 29.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis