Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 224077 (MAD)

T.Markandayar v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/32603/2025 · 2025-12-01

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 T.Markandayar Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police Periyanaikenpalayam Police Station, Crime No.632/2025, Coimbatore District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant Anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS to the Petitioner/Accused (T. Markandayar) in the event of his arrest in Crime No.632/2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Muniyappan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) and 311 of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.632 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with other accused, trespassed into the room of the defacto complainant and robbed 9 mobile phones at knife point from the defacto complainant and his friends. Hence, this case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the mobile phones have been recovered. He further submitted that there is no previous cases pending against him, hence the learned counsel prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reported that 9 mobile phones were robbed by the petitioner, out of which 5 mobile phones were recovered. He further submitted that there are nine previous cases pending against the petitioner including several robbery cases. Hence, the learned counsel opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 5.Considering the pending recovery of 4 mobile phones and the petitioner’s history of 9 previous cases, including robbery, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to to the petitioner. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 01-12-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 To 1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police Periyanaikenpalayam Police Station, Crime No.632/2025, Coimbatore District. 2.The Judicial Magistrate-5, Coimbatore. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 32603 of 2025 01-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis