Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22407 (PAT)

Md. Sameer @ Sameer Jafari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./13266/2025 · 2025-04-17

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13266 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-698 Year-2020 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Md. Sameer @ Sameer Jafari S/o Rahamat @ Shekh Rahmat Hussain @ Rahmat Hussain R/o vill - Semra Belwatia, P.S.- Turkauliya, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari 2. Md. Sonu @ Sonu Alam S/o Rahmat @ Shekh Rahmat Hussain @ Rahmat Hussain R/o vill - Semra Belwatia, P.S.- Turkauliya, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 17-04-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to Petitioner No. 1 has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 25.03.2025. 3. Petitioner No. 2 apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 4. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted one Md. Shahid by means of iron rod. 5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13266 of 2025(3) dt.17-04-2025 2/2 behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to land dispute between the parties, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Considering the nature of accusation and case and counter-case between the parties, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 698 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T