Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22407 (GAU)

MD. MAJIBUR RAHMAN v. FUL MAHMUD ALI AND 4 ORS

CRP/4/2025 · 2025-01-19

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010277932024 2025:GAU-AS:542 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/4/2025 MD. MAJIBUR RAHMAN S/O MD. FAIZUR RAHMAN, R/O VILL- NIZ SINDURIGHOPA (LAXMI NAGAR), MOUZA- SILA SINDURIGHOPA, P.O. AND P.S.-CHANGSARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781101 VERSUS FUL MAHMUD ALI AND 4 ORS S/O LATE NURUDDIN ALI, R/O VILL- SIL BHARAL, P.O. AND P.S.- CHANGSARI, PIN-781101 2:DIL MOHAMMAD ALI S/O LATE NURUDDIN ALI R/O VILL- SIL BHARAL P.O. AND P.S.-CHANGSARI PIN-781101 3:PIR MOHAMMAD ALI S/O LATE NURUDDIN ALI R/O VILL- SIL BHARAL P.O. AND P.S.-CHANGSARI PIN-781101 4:JAN MOHHAMAD ALI S/O LATE NURUDDIN ALI R/O VILL- SIL BHARAL P.O. AND P.S.-CHANGSARI PIN-781101 5:SAGIRUL ISLAM S/O LATE ALI ASGAR AHMED R/O LAXMI NAGAR Page No.# 2/3 CHANGSARI P.O. AND P.S.-CHANGSARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78110 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Ms. J Paul Advocate for the respondent(s): B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 20.01.2025 Heard Ms. J Paul, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press the instant revision petition, however, would avail other remedy as available under the law. 3. Taking into account the above, the instant revision petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. Withdrawal of the instant revision petition shall not preclude or prejudice the petitioner in taking appropriate steps, if permissible under the law. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant