[2025:RJ-JP:23403] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 278/2025 Priyanshu Gulpadiya S/o Balkrishan Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Amolak Nagar, Tehsil Mahawa, District Dausa (Rajasthan), At Present Fireman, Agnishaman Kendra, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Dy. GA Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. Heard the application No.278/2025 for seeking rectification of the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6596/2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was allowed on 18.06.2025 by this Court and during the course of arguments, it was categorically submitted that the charge-sheet has not been filed. However, in the order, it has been indicated that the charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, he prays for rectification of the order dated 18.06.2025. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor also supports the said contention and submits that due to some bona fide typographical mistake in [2025:RJ-JP:23403] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-278/2025] the order, it has been mentioned that the charge-sheet has been filed whereas the charge-sheet has not been filed. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Since the bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 18.06.2025. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is a young student and he is in judicial custody since 26.04.2025 and also considering the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and the trial will take considerable time, therefore, the application was allowed while taking the said facts on record. 6. After passing of the bail order, the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail and there is no concealment as such on the part of learned counsel for the petitioner, the aforesaid mistake was bona fide, therefore, this fact as mentioned in the aforesaid application No.278/2025 is taken on record. 7. The application is disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J DEEPA RANI-1s