Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 223948 (MAD)

A.SAHARSRANAMAM v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

WP/48796/2025 · 2025-12-17

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.48796 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.12.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.48796 of 2025 and WMP Nos.54486 and 54488 of 2025 A.Sahasranamam .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Executive Engineer, Zone VIII, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.13/B/36B, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai 600 003. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the notice Z.O.VIII.C.No.2297/2025 dated 23.04.2025 by the 1st respondent and direct the 1st respondent not to insist on submission of regularised plan as petitioner’s building stands duly regularised prusuant to the Commissioner’s Regularisation Order dated 30.07.2001 bearing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.48796 of 2025 Rev.Building Regularisation Permit No.215/2000 and further direct the 1st respondent to issue a copy of regularised plan as revised building regularisation permit No.215/2000 dated 30.07.2001 and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with or harass the petitioner or his wife with coercive or sealing action in respect of the said property, direct imposition of exemplary costs/punitive action against the 1st respondent for dereliction of duty, harassment of senior citizens and misuse of official power. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : M/s.Aswini Devi Stdg. Counsel for RR 1 and 2 * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Challenge to the communication dated 23.04.2025 is made on the ground that the document dated 30.07.2001, a copy of which was sought by the authority from the petitioner, is already lying with the respondents. 2. The impugned letter was given to the petitioner wayback in the month of April. We fail to understand as to why the petitioner did https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.48796 of 2025 not challenge it. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order. Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications stand closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 17.12.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sra To 1. The Executive Engineer, Zone VIII, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.13/B/36B, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Buildings, Chennai 600 003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.48796 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. (sra) WP No.48796 of 2025 17.12.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis