- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7370 WP No. 10971 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10971 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SMT. VAISHALI NAIN, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, W/O BISHNU PRASAD DAS, R/AT TRANZOTEL SUITES AND INN, CHANDRAMOULESHWARA LAYOUT, KEMPEGOWDA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ROAD, HUNASEMMARANAHALLI, BANGALORE-562 157. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDAY PRAKASH MULIYA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KAMALUDDIN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY HOME DEPARTMENT, BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIKKAJALA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE-562 157. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7370 WP No. 10971 of 2021 4. SRI. SANJEEV KUMAR NAIN, S/O MUNSHI NAIN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.1140, PATTI MULLA, SARURPUR KALAN, DISTRICT-BAGHPAT, UTTAR PRADESH-250 619. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; R4-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Uday Prakash Muliya., counsel on behalf of Sri.Kamaluddin., for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of direction against respondents 1 to 3 to protect her as well as her husband, Sri.Bishnu Prasad's life and dignity, being invaded and threatened by the fourth respondent and his family members and direct the fourth respondent and his family members not to interfere into life and liberty of the petitioner and her husband, on the following facts and circumstances. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7370 WP No. 10971 of 2021 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.Uday Prakash Muliya., submits that as of today there is no threat by the fourth respondent. However, the petitioner apprehends threat in future. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 5. Taking note of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that there is no threat as of today, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. Needless to say, the apprehension about the future threat cannot be predicted as of today. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36