BHAIRULAL DHAKAD S/O SHRI ONKARLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8046/2025 · 2025-08-06
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8046/2025 Bhairulal Dhakad S/o Shri Onkarlal, Age 45 Years, R/o Village Kawarji Ke Khedi, Police Station Sigoli, District Neemach (Mp) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 06/08/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 50/2025 registered at Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 8/18 of NDPS Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that recovery of contraband article-opium was effected from co- accused Hemendra. The recovered quantity of opium is 11.384 KG, which is below commercial quantity. There is no evidence on the record that petitioner alongwith the other co- accused were traveling in a car and thereafter co-accused Hemendra run away from the car. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. The accused petitioners are in
[2025:RJ-JP:30280] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8046/2025] custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused- petitioners. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of bail application and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. Heard and perused the material available on the record. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that recovery of contraband article were effected from co-accused Hemendra and not from the present petitioner. There are no criminal antecedents against the present petitioner. The accused petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Bhairulal Dhakad S/o Shri Onkarlal, in connection with FIR No. 50/2025 registered at Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /136