[2025:RJ-JP:32501-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 827/2025 Abrar Ansari S/o Gafoor Ansari, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Sarukh Khudad, Post Achaljamu (Asalsham) Police Station Visva Nagar, District Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) At Present R/o Ahmed Raza 72, Shiv Colony Infront Of Kohinoor Cinema Sanganer Jaipur 302029 (At Present In Open Air Camp Sanganer Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Secretary, Department Of Home (Group-12), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Magistrate, Hazaribagh Jharkhand. 4. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 19/08/2025 1. This writ petition is filed challenging the condition imposed in order dated 21.05.2025, whereby the permanent parole was granted subject to furnishing of two solvent surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each and a personal bond of Rs.50,000/-. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.) No.4, Jaipur City, in case No.07/2010 vide judgment dated 26.03.2011 and the petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:32501-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-827/2025] was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. The petitioner after serving more than twenty years of imprisonment with remission applied for permanent parole and was accordingly granted vide order dated 21.05.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is not in a position to furnish two solvent surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each and personal bond of Rs.50,000/- however on specific instructions, submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish one solvent surety bond and the personal bond. 3. Learned GA cum AAG submits that the report regarding financial position is annexed with the reply. 4. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings. 5. As per the report dated 31.07.2025 annexed with the reply, the petitioner has old parents who are surviving by grazing cattle. Two brothers of the petitioner working in the Middle East country are separated from the family. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order is modified to the extent that the petitioner be released on permanent parole subject to furnish one solvent surety bond of Rs.50,000/- and a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Jaipur Rajasthan. 7. Accordingly the writ petition is allowed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J ANIL/DIKSHA-29