IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 12860/2025 Decided on: 08.08.2025 Mahinder Narwal & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Learned counsel for the petitioners has been allowed to correct the name of petitioner No.1 from Mohinder Narwal to Mahinder Narwal. 2. Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have filed their respective representations at Annexure P- 6/colly to the respondents/competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. Petitioners’ grievance is that the said representations preferred by them to the respondents for 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 redressal of their grievances in light of settled legal position have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 08th August, 2025(rohit)