YARLAGADDA BHULAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15751/2025 · 2025-07-24
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22382 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22382 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
<2^ ¥ APHC010314812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE SUBBA WRIT PETITION NO: 15751 OF 2025 REDDY SATTI Between: Yarlagadda Bhulakshmi, W/o Doppalapudi Rajsekahar Occupation Secondary Grade teacher, r White field Apartments, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. , Aged about 44 years. D.No. 7-334/ A/302, Sai Bharathi ...PETITIONER AND
1. The state ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 3. The Joint Collector, Guntur District
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali
5. The Tahasildar, Kakumanu Mandal,
6. The Mandal Surveyor, Kakumanu Mandal,
7. The Village Revenue Officer Guntur District
8. The Sub Registrar, Kakumanu, Guntur
9. The Kommuru Gramapanchayat, Rep, by its Secretary, Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District
10. The Station House Officer, Guntur District Guntur. Guntur District Guntur District Guntur District Kommuru Village, Kakumanu Mandal, District. Kommuru Kakumanu Police Station Kakumanu,
m tx ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue a Writ, order ^ of Writ of Mandamus declaring the and 6TH the High Court may be or direction more particularly one in the nature action of the respondents, specifically 5 in not considering the Online Application FSNV012500680167 dated 17.03.2025 dated 17.03.2025 No. not disposing the F Line Application the petitioner for not made by demarcation and fix the boundary i in Survey.No.63-7 (Sub Divided conducting survey, m respect of the petitioner agricultural land into 63 7B) to an extent of Acres 0.30 cents. Mandal, Guntur District is highly violation of Principles of Natural Justice situated at Kommuru Village, Kakumanu illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, vi also in violation of Articles 14 and and 300-A of the Constitution of India, -1 Survey and Boundaries Act apart from violation of Andhra Pradesh RespoldenJt! survey demarcation, and fix the boundaries through dispose (F-Line into 63- cents, situated at Kommuru Village, Kakumanu online Application No. FSNV012500680167 dated A 17.03.2025 PP ica ion) made by the petitioner in Survey.No.63-7 (Sub Divided i 't3) to an extent of Acres 0.30 Mandal, Guntur District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. KETHVATHU PARVATHI BAI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7;GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. Counsel for the Respondent No.
8: GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION 9: SRI M. SUDHIR, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & gram PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.10: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order;
APHC010314812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15751/2025 Between: 1.YARLAGADDA BHULAKSHMI, W/0 DOPPALAPUDI RAJSEKAHAR, AGED ABOUF 44 YEARS. OCCUPATION SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, D.NO. 7-334/ A/302, SAI BHARATHI WHITE FIELD APARTMENFS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR SECRETARY, BUILDINGS, DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
5. THE TAHASILDAR, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
f THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, KOMMURU VILLAGE, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
7. 8. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KAKUMANU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE KOMMURU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, KOMMURU VILLAGE, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
9.
10.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KAKUMANU POLICE STATION, KAKUMANU, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, specifically 5‘^ and 6**^ Respondents in not considering the Online Application No. FSNVOI2500680167 dated 17.03.2025, not disposing the F Line Application dated 17.03.2025 made by the petitioner for not conducting survey, demarcation and fix the boundary in respect of the petitioner agricultural land in Survey.No.63-7 (Sub Divided into 63 7B) to an extent of Acres 0.30 cents, situated at Kommuru Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, apart from violation of Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and consequently direct the respondents specifically 5 and 6TH Respondents to conduct the survey demarcation, and fix the boundaries through dispose online Application No. FSNVOI2500680167 dated 17.03.2025 Line Application) made by the petitioner in Survey.No.63-7 (Sub Divided into 63- 7B) to an extent of Acres 0.30 cents, situated at Kommuru Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KETHVATHU PARVATHI BAI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER Acting upon the letter addressed by the petitioner on 22.07.2025, requesting to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition due to changed circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Initially, the writ petition was listed on 27.06.2025 and thereafter at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, it was listed on 01.07.2025 and 03.07.2025.
2. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition, due to changed circumstances as pointed out. No costs.
3. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 One CC to M/s. Kethvathu Parvathi Bai, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCS to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Stamps & Registration, High Court of Andhra
4. Two CCs to GP for Pradesh [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies ssb
HIGH COURT DATED:25/07/2025 I 0 MUG OT J Currenl Seciion .
ORDER WP No.15751 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS