1 2025:CGHC:38190 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3687 of 2023 Rajneesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Dinesh Tiwari Aged About 53 Years R/o 6, Sumitra Vihar, Mahrashi School Road , Mangala District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Currently Posted As Assistant Administrative Officer (Programmer) Salary Roll No. 701134 Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Divisional Office L I C Building 3rd Flor Magarpara Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Life Insurance Corporation Of India Through Executive Director (Marketing/ P D) Central Office, Yagakshema, Jeevan Bima Marg Mumbai Maharashtra 2 - Life Insurance Corporation Of India Through Sr. Divisional Manager And Disciplinary Authority Divisional Office Jeevan Prakash Jeevan Bima Marg, P.B. No. 10, Pandri, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Senior Divisional Manager Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Divisional Office Bilaspur, Division Code 303, Magarpara Road, Masanganj Chhattisgarh 4 - Shri Ajay Mishra Salary Roll No. 217763, Development Officer L I C India, At Branch Office Naila Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For Respective Respondents : Mr. Rakshit Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal and Mr. Sudhanshu Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.08.01 18:33:54 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 01.08.2025 1 Heard Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Rakshit Tiwari, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel and Mr. Sudhanshu Mishra, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Prateek Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents. 2 The petitioner has filed this petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be call the records from the respondents authorities. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take action against respondent no.4 as per the rules and regulation mention in Annexure (P/2 and P/3). 10.3 Any other relief /relief's which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, may be provided to the petitioner.” 3 It is submitted by Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner that the client is not responding to him and pleads no instructions in the matter. 4 In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh