APHC010314992019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14611/2019 Between: 1. VENKATA RAVI VARMA LAXMANA RAO, S/O.GOPAL RAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC.-PRIVATE TEACHER., R/O. KARAKAVANIPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL GORAPALLI, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDEM KOTHAVEEDI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISHAKAPANTAM RURAL. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GREHANDS (ANTI NAXAL OPERATION). 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SILERU POLICE STATION. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT, AREA HOSPITAL, NARSIPATNAM. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT, KGH HOPSITAL, VISHAKAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAMBURI SREEMANNARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. G P FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14611 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Wirt, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondent herein in killing the deceased in burtal encounter namely Aruna and others on 22.09.2019 between the alleged greyhounds and naxals at Gudem Kothaveedi Panchayat as being illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and against the Rule of law and it is further declare the action of the police in registering case under 307 IPC as illegal consequentially direct the Respondents herein to register the crime under 302 IPC and investigate by independent agency by constructing SIT and pass…” 2. Sri U.D.Jai Bhima Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Namburi Sreemannarayana, learned counsel for the writ petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.09.2025 Pmk 4 03 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14611 OF 2019 Date: 03.09.2025 Pmk