Sri. Kappala Nageswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/20909/2020 · 2025-09-02
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22373 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22373 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010315752020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20909/2020 Between:
1. SRI. KAPPALA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA APPAIAH, AGED ABOUT . 64 YEARS, 0CC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. D. NO. 14-32- 109/55/2, ASHOK NAGAR, PEDA GANTYADA VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, AT VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20909 of 2020 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare that the inaction of the Respondent No.4 in enquiring and investigate into the said crime and give protection to my property and person, as illegal, unsustainable, against the law, void, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice, and consequentially direct the 4th Respondent to investigate and file report under the law, and pass.…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025. UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.20909 of 2020
Dated.03.09.2025
UPS
147