- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:620 WP No. 11256 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 11256 OF 2024 (BDA) BETWEEN: SRI CHALUVARAYASWAMY DALITHA HAGU HINDULIDA VARGADAVARA KSHEMABHRUVIDDI SANGHA HAVING THE REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.155/C, 4TH CROSS, BDA LAYOUT, CHAMUNDINAGARA, BANASHANKARI III STAGE BENGALURU-560085 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI T. PRABHAKAR, S/O LATE N THIMMAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:620 WP No. 11256 of 2024 2. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMARA PARK WEST, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU-560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R-1, SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ALLOT THE SITES IN ANY NEAR VICINITY TO THE AREA FROM WHICH THE MEMBERS OF THE PETITIONER SOCIETY AS SHOWN AT ANNEXURE-D DATED 29.05.2017 WERE DISPLACE, AS ALLOTTED IN FAVOUR OF THE OTHER 243 MEMBERS FORTHWITH. ALTERNATIVELY, DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR ALLOTMENT OF SITES AS PERSUADING BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY IN FAVOUR OF 156 MEMBER IN TERMS OF THEIR GRIEVANCES ADDRESSED UNDER THE REPRESENTATION AS PER ANNEXURE-J DATED 25.03.2024 AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING `B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Petitioner is before this Court for the third occasion seeking similar relief which was sought in earlier writ petition in W.P.No.6152/2014 which was disposed of on 02.06.2014 - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:620 WP No. 11256 of 2024 directing the respondent-State Government to consider the representation of the petitioner-association. Thereafter petitioner approached this Court once again by filing writ petition in W.P.No.11891/2020 which was disposed of on 05.11.2020 issuing similar direction. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to the said order respondent-BDA had opened up the file and several proceedings had taken place as per Annexure-D but no positive action has been taken till date. 3. However, respondent-BDA by endorsement dated 18.03.2024 has stated that there appears to be some suspicion with regard to allotment of sites in respect of 153 members and that the requisition of the petitioner would be considered after detailed verification in accordance with law. Since no action is taken, yet again the petitioner is before this Court. 4. Heard and perused the records. 5. Endorsement dated 18.03.2024 reads as under: ೆಂಗಳರು ಅ ವೃ ಾಾರ Bangalore Development Authority . ೌಡಯ ರೆ, ಕುಾರ ಾ ಪ!"ಮ ೆಂಗಳರು-560 020 ¸ÀASÉå:¨ÉAC¥Áæ/GPÁ-4/7942/2023-24 ¢£ÁAPÀ:18/03/2024 - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:620 WP No. 11256 of 2024 $ಂಬರಹ 'ಷಯ: ಸ*ಾ+ನ ಮುಖಮಂ.ಗಳ '/ೇಷ ಜನಸ2ಂದನ ಾಯಕಮದ45 6ಾವ7 ಸ458ರುವ ಕುಂದುೊರ6ೆ ಮನ' ಸಂ:ೆ 007227, *ಾಂಕ 16.01.2024. ;ೕಲ=ಂಡ 'ಷಯೆ= ಸಂಬಂ8ದಂ6ೆ, ಬನಶಂಕ? 3*ೇ ಹಂತ AೊಸೆBೆಹCD Eಾಮದ ಸFೆ ನಂ 89. 90, 91 ಮತು 94 ರ45ಯ 399 ಗುGಸಲುಗಳನುH AಾIೊಂಡು ಸುಾರು ವಷಗCಂದ Fಾಸ'ದJ KFಾ8ಗಳ ಗುGಸಲುಗಳನುH ೆಂಗಳರು ಅ ವೃ ಾಾರದ ವ.Lಂದ ಬMಾವNೆ Kಾಣ ಾಡಲು *ೆಲ ಸಮEೊC8ದುJ, ಈ ೈI 243 (20x30) ಅG KFೇಶನಗಳR ಾತ ಮಂಜೂBಾSದುJ ಉCೆ 156 KFೇಶನಗಳನುH ಮಂಜೂರು ಾಡಲು ೋ?ರುವ ಬEೆU. ಪ?!ೕ4ಸVಾS, ;ೕಲ=ಂಡ Wೇಾ ವೃ ಸಂಘದವರು Yದ4Kಂದಲೂ KೕGರುವ ಮನ'ಯ45 243 KBಾ!ತರು ಎಂದು ಉVೆ5ೕ[8ರುವಂ6ೆ ಾಾರ ಂದ ಎVಾ5 243 KBಾ!ತ?ಗೂ ಸAಾ 20x30 ಅG ಅಳ6ೆಯ KFೇಶನಗಳನುH ಹಂ\ೆ ಾG *ಾಂಕ 25.08.2018 ರಂದು ಕಮFಾS ಶುದ ಕಯಪತಗಳನೂH ಸಹ *ೋಂದ] ಾG ಾ^ೕನ ಪತಗಳನುH 'ತ?ಸVಾSರುತ_ೆ. ಈಗ 6ಾವ7 ಸ458ರುವ ಮನ'ಯ45 399 KBಾ!ತ?Eೆ KFೇಶನಗಳನುH ಹಂ\ೆ ಾಡಲು ೋ?ರುವಂ6ೆ ಕಡತದ45 399 ರ ಜನ KBಾ!ತರ ಬEೆU ಉVೆ5ೕಖFಾSರುವ7 ಲ5. ಅದJ?ಂದ ಈ ಬEೆU ಾಾರದ ಕಡತದ45 ಉCದ 156 ಜನ KBಾ!ತರ ಬEೆU ಾಾರದ ಆರaಕ ಅೕaಕರವರು ವರ ಯನುH KೕG "ತಮ+ ಸಂಘದ KBಾ!ತರ ಸಂ:ೆಯನುH 243 ಎಂಬು_ಾS .C8ರು6ಾBೆ. ಆದBೆ *ಾಂಕ 18.11.2020 ರ ಮನ'ಯ45 ಇದJI=ದJಂ6ೆ 399 ಗುGಸಲುಗಳನುH 1984 *ೇ ಾ4ನ45 *ೆಲಸಮEೊC8ರುವ7_ಾS .C8. ಉCೆ 153 KFೇಶನಗಳನುH ಹಂ\ೆ ಾಡಲು ೋ?ರುವ7ದು ಸಂಶcಾಸ2ದFಾSರುತ_ೆ' ಎಂದು ವರ ಯನುH KೕGರು6ಾBೆ. ಈ $*ೆHVೆಯ45 Kಮ+ ಮನ'ಯ ಬEೆU ಕೂಲಂಕುಶFಾS ಪ?!ೕ48, Kಯಾನುಾರ ಕಮೈEೊಳDVಾಗುವ7_ೆಂದು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ .CಸVಾS_ೆ. ¸À»/- G¥À PÁAiÀÄðzÀ²ð(ºÉZÀÄѪÀj) ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ¥Áæ¢üPÁgÀ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:620 WP No. 11256 of 2024 6. Perusal of it indicates that respondent-BDA has neither rejected nor declined to consider the representation of the petitioner. On the other hand has expressed its apprehension with regard to claim of 153 members and has further stated that it would take necessary action after due verification of the records. In that view of the matter there appears to be no cause of action for the petitioner to come to this Court at this juncture. Writ petition is disposed of. Notwithstanding the same, respondent-BDA to expedite the process in considering the representation of the petitioner at any rate within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SBN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51