Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22362 (AP)

A ALAVUDEEN v. The Union of India

WP/15048/2019 · 2025-08-06

B V L N Chakravarthi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010316152019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15048/2019 Between: 1. A ALAVUDEEN, S/O AZEEMUDIN SAHEB AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 0CC RETD RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O PLOT NO 142, THUKIVAKAM RURAL CHITTOOR DIST, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 259, R.M.K. GARDEN ( THALANCHERI)) IKKADU TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT T.N. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS 256-A, RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI. 2. SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, RAIL NILAYAM SECUNDERABAD 3. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, GUNTAKAL DIVISION SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, GUNTAKAL, ANATAPUR DISTRICT A.P. 4. WORK SHOP ACCOUNTS OFFICER/ CRS TPTY RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or 2 direction more particularly in the nature of MANDAMUS, Declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the part pensionary benefits of the petitioner as being Illegal, Arbitrary, Capricious, Malafide, Contrary to the Pension and Gratuity Rules consequentially direct the respondents to release the withhold part pensionary benefits of the petitioner at an earliest and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to grant interim directions directing the respondents to release the part pensionary benefits which is withhold by the respondents forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M MEHDI HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Pasala Ponna Rao, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15048 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 01.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 07.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15048 of 2019 Date: 07.08.2025 PSA