Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6826-2025 Date of Decision: 25.04.2025
VIKAS MALIK ... PETITIONER VS.
UT CHANDIGARH & ANR .. RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Komal Balain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP for U.T.Chandigarh. ****** MANISHA BATRA
, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondent-U.T.Chandigarh submits that mobile phone has been returned back by the CFSL Authorities and petitioner can have it after moving an appropriate application in this regard. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the main petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. 25.04.2025 (MANISHA BATRA) smriti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.04.28 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment