IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CRM-M-7384-2025 Date of decision :27.03.2025 RAJVIR SINGH @ RINKA ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT *** Present :- Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. *** N. S. SHEKHAWAT, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.7, dated 03.02.2024, under Section 25 of Arms Act & 21 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (Section 29 of Arms Act added later on), registered at Police Station Jhabal, District Taran Tarn (Annexure P-1). 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 10.02.2025, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and has been nominated as an accused in the present case on the basis of disclosure VIPIN KUMAR 2025.04.01 20:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-7384-2025 statement suffered by co-accused Amritpal Singh @ Peter. He next submits that two pistols of .32 bore along with five live cartridges and one country made pistol were allegedly recovered from co-accused Amritpal Singh @ Peter and no contraband was recovered from him or the present petitioner. Still, the provisions of Section 21 of the NDPS Act have been wrongly invoked in the present case. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready to join the investigation.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 10.02.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. ( N. S. SHEKHAWAT ) JUDGE 27.03.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.04.01 20:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order