Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22355 (AP)

M. KALAVATHI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14451/2018 · 2025-09-11

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010315992018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14451/2018 Between: 1. M. KALAVATHI, W/O LATE LAXMAN RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO 29-2-6, BESIDES VETERINARY HOSPITAL, VISAKHAPATNAM -530002, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522503 2. THE COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. S RAVI JOERGE, S/O S. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO 13-12-1/3, ANTHONY NAGAR, MAHARANI PETA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto lam any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or appropriate writ I. to declare the inaction of the revaair No.2 in not initiating legal action against the representation dated 11-04-2018 10 the 2nd respondent by the petitioner herein to take necessary action as per 2 the illegal and unauthorized constructions made by the 3 1 respondent herein without following the building rules and regulations as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and II. consequently praying this Honorable Court to issue a direction to the respondents specifically to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the representation dated 11-04-2018 made by the petitioner by taking necessary legal action according to law in removing the illegal and unauthorized constructions made contrary to the building rules and regulations by the 3rd respondent. III. to grant such other order or orders as this Honorable Court deems fit and proper in the Circumstances of the case.. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents specifically Respondent No.2 to stop the illegal and unauthorized constructions of the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass . Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SHANMUKHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SUBBA REDDY 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondent authorities. The unauthorized portion of the construction by the 3rd respondent was demolished by the 2nd respondent and that the 3rd respondent has completed the construction as per the plan and is in occupation of the same. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.09.2025 SR