HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.1231/2025 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1667/2025 1. Surajmal Meena S/o Shri Ramratan Meena, Aged 33 Years, R/o Batwadi Ki Dhani, Tan Dangarwada Khurd, Police Station Amber Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Rajulal @ Raju S/o Late Shri Lalaram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Dhyawano Ki Dhani, Tan Raniyawas, Post Rahori Police Station Jamwaramgarh, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Accused/Appellants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara with Mr. Yunus Khan Mr. Man Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.) Order 26/06/2025 Learned Counsel Mr. Man Singh Meena who appeared in connected appeal filed on behalf of accused-appellant Rajulal @ Raju in SB Criminal Appeal (SB) No.1668/2025 has no objection if Mr. Narendra Mewara argue this present appeal on behalf of appellant- Rajulal @ Raju. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-appellants and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence. [2025:RJ-JP:23605] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1667/2025] The applicant-appellants herein have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 365, 325/34, 323/34 & 341 of IPC vide judgment dated 03.06.2025 passed by learned Session Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur (Rajasthan) in Sessions Case No.72/2023 (38/2018) (NCV No.296/2019) and have been sentenced to maximum punishment of three years. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the accused appellants were on bail during trial and they did not misuse the liberty of bail. He further submits that the sentence awarded to the applicants-appellants has already been suspended by the trial court for a month. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellants and having regard to the facts and circumstances as available on the record, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused appellants during pendency of the instant appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by the passed by learned Session Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur (Rajasthan) vide judgment dated 03.06.2025 in Sessions Case No.72/2023 (38/2018) (NCV No.296/2019) against the appellants-applicants shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in the court on 28.07.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:- [2025:RJ-JP:23605] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1667/2025] 1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided. 2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused- applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.)),J YOGESH/133