Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22351 (PNJ)

LAHORA SINGH v. RAJ KUMAR AND ANR

CRM-A/2/2018 · 2025-08-20

Deepak Gupta, Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-A-2-MA-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 CRM-A-2-MA-2018 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 Lahora Singh .....Applicant Versus Raj Kumar and Another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S.Sekhon, Advocate for the applicant. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present application seeking leave to appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 01.03.2017 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Guruhar Sahai, dismissing the complaint preferred by appellant under Section 307 read with Section 511, Sections 326, 324, 323 IPC against accused-respondent. (2) At the outset, in view of judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in case titled as “Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran and Others” reported in 2025 INSC 804, learned counsel, on instructions, from KAVNEET SINGH 2025.08.22 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-A-2-MA-2018 applicant wishes to withdraw the present application with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available before learned Sessions Court. (3) Disposed off accordingly. (4) Needless to say that time consumed before this Court while pursuing CRM-A-2-MA-2018 shall be considered in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 while condoning the delay before learned Sessions Court. Pending application(s), including application for condonation of delay shall also stand disposed off. ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) JUDGE (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE 20th August, 2025 kavneet singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAVNEET SINGH 2025.08.22 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document