APHC010315312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI V- MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT _ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION No.6484 OF 2025 'O ■oi o £ Between: 1. Ambati Tirumala Reddy @ Thirupal Reddy, S/o. A. Narayana Reddy, aged about 65 years, R/o. D.No. 12-3-979, 5*^ cross, Vidhyuth Nagar, Ananthapur Town, Ananthapur District. 2. Chavva Rajasekhar Reddy, S/o. Late Chavva Venkatarami Reddy, aged about 60 years, R/o. D. No. 12-3-48, 3'^^ Cross, Sai Nagar, Ananthapur Town, Ananthapur District. 3. Ambati Praneeth Reddy, S/o. Ambati Tirumala Reddy, aged about 40 years, R/o.D.No. 12-3-979, 5*^ cross, Vidhyuth Nagar, Ananthapur Town, Ananthapur District, Now residing at #205, Novas Square Apartments, Thanisandra Main Road, Hegde Nagar, Beside Diana College, Bangalore North, Bangalore City, Karnataka State. ...Petitioners/AI to A3 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court AtAmaravati. 2. Kunukuntia Jagadeeswar Reddy, S/o. K. Pulla Reddy, aged about 47 years, R/o.D.No.12-4-954-C3, II Floor, Adarsha Nagar, Ananthapur Town, Ananthapur District. ...Respondents/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (U/s.528 of B.N.S.S. 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in C.C.No.546 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anarithapui^acpu quash the same. '' IA No.1 01 .Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (U/s.528 of B.N.S.S. 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of petitioners in C.C.No. 546 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ananthapuramu, Pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared by person or Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following order: APHC010315312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6484/2025 Between: 1.AMBATI TIRUMALA REDDY @ THIRUPAL REDDY,, S/0. A. NARAYANA REDDY,AGEDABOUT 65 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 12-3-979, 5TH CROSS, VIDHYUTH NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANANTHAPUR TOWN 2.CHAWA RAJASEKHAR REDDY,, S/0. LATE CHAWA VENKATARAMI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 12-3-48, ANANTHAPUR REDDY CROSS, SAI NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN, DISTRICT 3RD 3.AMBATI PRANEETH REDDY,, S/0. AMBATI TIRUMALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 12-3-979, 5TH CROSS, VIDHYUTH NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT APARTMENTS, THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD, HEGDE NAGAR, BESIDE DIANA COLLEGE BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE CITY, KARNATAKA STATE NOW RESIDING AT 205, NOVAS SQUARE ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI. 2.KUNUKUNTIA JAGADEESWAR REDDY, S/O.K. PULLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/0. D.NO. 12-4-954-C3, II FLOOR, ADARSHA nagaR district ananthapur TOWN, ananthapur ■•.RESP0NDENT/C0IVIPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petifioner/a 1.K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/c ccused(S): omplainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 % 1 Order: Heard the learned counsel Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. appearing for the petitioners and the learned 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the arraigned as Accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.546 of 2020 Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ananthapuramu under Sections 448 and 506 r/w 34 of the IPC. respondent had taken the premises of the 1 petitioners are / on the file of the for the alleged offences It is submitted that the 2'"'^ petitioner on lease and was operating a bar and restaurant therein at the relevant alleged that the petitioners trespassed into the point of time. It is said premises and committed the aforesaid offences. However, it is submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the premises and, therefore, cannot be charged with trespassing into his own property. 3. Considering the same, and also taking into account that the calendar case IS of the year 2020, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the when the petitioners’ Magistrate, for the purpose of the trial. presence of the petitioners, except on dates presence is required, as directed by the learned 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed off. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, \ 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class 2. The Station House Offcier, Ananthapur. 3. One CC to Sri. K Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, Amaravati, [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies. Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. Ananthapur I Town Police Station, [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Gkk vna HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER CRLP No.6484 OF 2025 ANDS^ I 10 JUL 2025 ^ . Current Section ^% DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION