Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 22348 (RAJ)
SUBHASH S/O SHRI BHAGWANARAM HARITWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3749/2025 · 2025-07-02
Anand Sharma
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22348 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3749/2025
1. Subhash S/o Shri Bhagwanaram Haritwal, Resident Of Chainpura, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
2. Banshi S/o Shri Banshi Boduram Dhaka, Resident Of Chainpura, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
3. Shivhpal S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Dhaka, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
4. Dayal S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Dhaka, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
5. Bhagirath S/o Shri Pannaram, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
6. Rooparam S/o Shri Pannaram, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
7. Mahendra S/o Shri Manglaram, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
8. Kishor S/o Shri Rooparam, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
9. Gopal S/o Shri Manglaram, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
10. Sanwarmal S/o Shri Ruparam, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
11. Girdhari Lal S/o Shri Ruparam, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan.
12. Kajormal S/o Shri Ruparam, Resident Of Dhingpur, Khatushyamji, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Shri Chimanlal S/o Shri Madhoram, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Dhingpur, Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.S. Rathore, PP
[2025:RJ-JP:24276] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3749/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 02/07/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on having instructions from the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the instant criminal misc. petition, as the petitioners want to submit a representation before the Investigating Officer. In view of above, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /120