[2025:RJ-JP:15287] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6267/2014 Tej Singh S/o Shri Kirodi, aged about 60 years, R/o Khedli Gadasiya, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Regional Manager, Bharatpur Sahakari Bhumi Vikash Bank Limited, Bharatpur Raj. 2. The Branch Manager, Bharatpur Sahakari Bhumi Vikash Bank Limited, Branch, Bayana Bharatpur Raj. 3. The Sub-Registrar, Sahakari Samities, Bharatpur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 04/04/2025 This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 06.03.2014 issued by the Court of Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Socities, Bharatpur with a further prayer to direct the respondents to furnish the details of the loan amount to the petitioner. This Court, vide its interim order dated 04.03.2016, issued following directions: “Issue notice to respondents. Rule is made returnable by four weeks. Notices be given ‘dasti’ for service. In the meantime, if petitioner deposits Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs only) and continue to deposit Rs.10,000/- per month in the first of week of every month commencing from May, [2025:RJ-JP:15287] (2 of 3) [CW-6267/2014] 2016, the respondents may not auction his property.” On 02.08.2023, this Court passed the following order: “Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the property in question was already taken over the respondents before the conditional interim order dated 04.03.2016 was passed. Even otherwise, the interim order was conditional and the petitioner did not comply with the conditions imposed vide order dated 04.03.2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take necessary instructions. List the matter on 28.08.2023.” On last date, i.e., 28.03.2025, this Court passed the following order: “Mr. Prakash Asnani-learned counsel appears for the respondents no.1 and 2. Service is complete. Mr. Asnani prays for and is granted a week's time to apprise this Court about current status of loan account. List the matter on 04.04.2025 at top of the list as prayed. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has not paid the loan amount and it is still outstanding against him. [2025:RJ-JP:15287] (3 of 3) [CW-6267/2014] When the learned counsel for the petitioner was requested to address the Court on merits of the case, he submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him and he has no instructions. In view of the aforesaid averments and taking into consideration the material on record especially, the order of this Court dated 02.08.2023, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /33