A.Abdul Azeez v. Mr. K.S.Mahendra Kumar and another
SUB APPL/1125/2025 · 2025-12-01
R N Manjula
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 223431 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 223431 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SUB APPL No. 1125 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA SUB APPL No. 1125 of 2025 IN CONT P NO. 3740 OF 2024
1. A.Abdul Azeez S/o. Abdul Muthalif, No. 41- B, Nagoor Salai, P.Konthangai, Thittacherri, 609 703 Nagapattinam District Applicant(s) Vs
1. Mr. K.S.Mahendra Kumar and another The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu state Transport Corporation Ltd., Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam-
612001. 2.Thiru. K.Elangovan, B.E., The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State transport Corporation Ltd., Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam-
612001. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Sub Application is filed to reopen the Contempt Petition No. 3740 of 2024 which was closed on 06.03.2025 For Applicant :Mr.R.Sivakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Murali Vinoth https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SUB APPL No. 1125 of 2025 ORDER In the earlier order dated 06.03.2025 made in Cont.P.No.3740/2024, a closure has been given to the contempt by making the following observation:
“2. Mr.Murali Vinodh, the learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that the respondents have deducted the dues to be paid by the petitioner from and out of the balance amount of Rs.5,58,308/- and now the amount payable to the petitioner after deduction would be Rs.79,709/- and that has also been paid.
3. The reduction as it appears from the statement of the respondents is towards the outstanding of the loan availed by the petitioner during his service. As the order has been substantially complied, the petitioner can raise any objection or challenge the same by initiating appropriate proceedings.”
2. The learned counsel for the applicant now submitted that the order has not been complied and the respondents revert back to their original position by making unnecessary claims and deductions.
3. Since the order has not been complied as per the earlier observation, I feel it is appropriate to allow this application to restore the contempt Petition.
4. Accordingly, this Sub – Application is allowed and Cont.P.No.3740 of 2024 is restored. 01-12-2025 bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SUB APPL No. 1125 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn SUB APPL No. 1125 of 2025 IN CONT P NO. 3740 OF 2024 01-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis