HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.293/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5666/2025 Shashank Jorwal S/o Shri Roopan Ram Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Darshan Dental College And Hospital, Loyara, Udaipur (Raj.). ----Non-Application/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Its Registrar, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302033. 3. The Controller Examination, Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302033. 4. Darshan Dental College And Hospital, Through Its Principal, Ranakpur Road, Village- Loyara, Udaipur- 313011 (Raj.) ----Applicants/Respondents For Non-applicant/ Petitioner : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Applicant/ Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/07/2025 1. By way of filing this application, a clarification has been sought of the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by this Court to the extent of changing the words ‘PUC Examination (Internal)’ to ‘Practical Examination’. (2 of 4) [WMAP-293/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants-respondents submits that while hearing the petition submitted by the petitioner this Court vide order dated 28.05.2025 has directed the respondents-RUHS to change the centre of the petitioner for PUC Examination (Internal) from R.R. Dental College, Udaipur to RUHS Government College, Jaipur. Counsel submits that in fact no internal exam is supposed to be taken at RUHS Government College, Jaipur. The RUHS Government College, Jaipur is supposed to take the practical examination of the petitioner, hence, under these circumstances, slight clarification is required. In support of his contentions, he has placed reliance upon the guidelines issued by the Dental Council of Inida. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the student-petitioner- Shashank Jorwal opposed the arguments raised by the counsel for the applicants-respondents and submitted that on account of personal grudges with the Darshan Dental College, the petitioner had apprehension that he might meet with unwanted circumstances or untoward incident, hence, under such circumstances, a prayer was made for change of centre for appearing in theory as well as in the internal examination. Counsel submits that considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this Court was not inclined to change the examination centre of the petitioner for appearing in theory paper, but so far as his prayer for appearing in internal examination at RUHS Government College is concerned, the same was accepted by this Court vide order dated (3 of 4) [WMAP-293/2025] 28.05.2025, hence, under these circumstances, no modification in the order dated 28.05.2025 is required. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 5. This Court while hearing the arguments of both sides, passed a detailed and specific order on 28.05.2025, which reads as under: “1. Matter come up on an application (I/A No.1/2025) submitted by the petitioner- applicant with the prayer for issuing direction against the respondent-University to change the examination centre of the petitioner to any Government Dental College of PUC Examination (Internal) and also of theory paper of Periodontology. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that college administration, where the petitioner is studying, is having personal grudges against him so, the petitioner is under apprehension that he may meet with any unwanted circumstances, therefore, in order to avoid the said eventuality, direction sought for in the application be issued. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposed the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner and submits that for theory examination, the examination centre assigned to the petitioner is Government College of Nursing M.B. Government Hospital, Udaipur and for Internal Examination, the examination centre is assigned to R.R. Dental College, Udaipur, hence, there is no basis for any apprehension, in the mind of the petitioner, hence, the application submitted by the petitioner is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submissions. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the counsel for the parties, this Court is not inclined to change the examination centre of the petitioner for appearing in theory paper, but so far as the second prayer with regard to (4 of 4) [WMAP-293/2025] the Internal Examination of the petitioner is concerned and looking to the fact that the petitioner is having apprehension of any untoward incident, in the interest of justice, the respondents are directed to change the centre of the petitioner for PUC Examination (Internal) R.R. Dental College, Udaipur to RUHS Government College, Jaipur. 6. Accordingly, the misc. application stands disposed of. 7. Since appropriate orders have been passed in the miscellaneous application now, nothing survives in the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.” 6. Perusal of the aforesaid order clearly indicates that the prayer of the petitioner for change of the examination centre for theory paper was not accepted, but his prayer for internal examination was considered and for the said purpose his examination centre was changed from R.R. Dental College, Udaipur to RUHS Government College, Jaipur. 7. It has been apprised at Bar that the practical examination of the petitioner has already been taken. 8. This Court finds no substance to entertain the instant misc. application, as the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by this Court, is clear and specific. By entertaining this application, this Court is not going to reopen the whole case again and pass fresh orders. 9. With the aforesaid observations, the instant misc. application stands dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/151