Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040000402025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/9/2025 M/s B M Store represented by Shri Kholie Hania, attorney holder of M/s B M Store, Son of Shri Kholie Tayo, a permanent resident of Upper Jumi, PO Kimin, PS Kimin, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented through the Secretary, Urban Development, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : District urban Development Agency Papum Pare District Yupia Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Director / Registrar Age: 0 Occupation : Satyajit Ray Film and Television institute Arunachal Pradesh Camp Office E.M. Bypass Panchasayar Kolkata 70009 Advocate for the Petitioner : Puto Bui, Talu Kamsar,S K Deori,Tsering Lhamu Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 25-02-2026 Heard Mr. Puto Bui, learned counsel for the petitioner, who fairly submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, however, he prays for a liberty to file appropriate writ petition by an appropriate petitioner in the event occasion arises. Ms P. Pangu, learned State counsel for the State respondents is present. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous. Needless to observe that any party, who is aggrieved by the action of appointment of employees in the institute, may file appropriate application, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant