[2025:RJ-JP:23509] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8034/2025 Ramjilal S/o Laduram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Hathipura, Tehsil Tunga, Dist. Jaipur, Police Station Bassi, Jaipur (East). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent connected with S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7302/2025 Krishna Kumar Meena S/o Late Shri Raju @ Rajendra Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Khanwas, Tehsil Lavaan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek, Advocate. Mr. Pravav Pareek, Advocate. Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, Advocate. Mr. Manav Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ajatshatru Meena, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, Public Prosecutor. Ms. Manju Dave Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.) Order 25/06/2025 1. Instant bail applications have been filed by accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.0300/2025 registered at Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City [2025:RJ-JP:23509] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8034/2025] (East)), District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 4 and 5 of The Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 288 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners argued that the explosive substance has not been recovered from the conscious possession of the accused-petitioners; accused-petitioners have been arrested on the basis of call details; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioners involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutors have opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as learned public prosecutors and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the facts that no explosive substance has been recovered from the conscious possession of the accused-petitioners; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioners involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Ramjilal S/o Laduram and Krishna Kumar Meena S/o Late Shri Raju @ Rajendra Meena [2025:RJ-JP:23509] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8034/2025] shall be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Tushar/88