RAJKUMAR RATRE @ R.K. RATRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/3920/2022 · 2025-08-25
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22336 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22336 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:43411
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3920 of 2022 * - Rajkumar Ratre @ R.K. Ratre S/o Sonu Ram Ratre Aged About 54 Years R/o E-21, Parijat Extension, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Engineer-In-Chief Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Vijay Korram @ Vijay Singh Koram, Posted As Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Astha Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Additional Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 26/08/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/ quash the impugned order dated 01.06.2022 (Annexure P/1) so far it relates to the petitioner and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting. 10.2 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.09.02 14:54:43 +0530
2
2. The petitioner who is holding the post of Superintendent Engineer under the Public Works Department and his services were transferred from Durg to Raipur vide order dated 01.06.2022 and against said
order, this petition has been preferred.
3. The interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner on 15.06.2022 which is still operating.
4. Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General would submit that transfer order was complied with by the petitioner and same is evident from certificate of handing over of charge dated
06.06.2022.
5. Considering the fact that the order of transfer order was complied with prior to passing of interim order, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter.
6. Consequently, the petition is disposed of.
7. The interim order dated 15.06.2022 is hereby vacated. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti