( 2025:JHHC:10461 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5178 of 2024 ------ Md. Abid Ansari, aged about 36 years, son of Md. Islam Amsari, resident of Jealgora No -16, Near Madarsa Manghaladih, P.O. Jealgora, P.S. Jorapokhar, District – Dhanbad, Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Musarat Naaz, aged about 22 years, D/o Md. Kamrul Huda, resident of Jealgora No. 16, Near Madarsa, Manjhladih, Jagidih, P.O. –Bansjoram, P.S. –Jorapokhar, Dist –Dhanbad, Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate ------ Order No.04 Dated- 03.04.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/323/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and under Section 3 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the informant treated the informant with cruelty in connection of demand of dowry and committed criminal breach of trust. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant-opposite party no.2 that there was a mediation between the parties during the pendency of this anticipatory bail application and the parties have decided to resume conjugal life. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No.27 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-