Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 223203 (MAD)

SANTHOSH KUMAR, v. The State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police

CRL OP/30263/2025 · 2025-11-06

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.30263 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.30263 of 2025 Santhosh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondent (Crime No.525 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime No.525 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : MG.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.30263 of 2025 326(a) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No. 525 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information, the respondent police went to the scene of occurrence and found that the petitioner had illegally transported 1/4 unit of river sand with the help of Tractor with Trailer. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, submitted that the petitioner had involved in illegal transportation of 1/4 unit of river sand. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.30263 of 2025 5. Considering the nature of allegations, the submissions made by learned counsels on either side, and considering the fact that the petitioner is not only illegally quarried river sand but also caused damage to the ecology and river bed, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 06.11.2025 drl To 1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.30263 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR , J. drl Crl.O.P.No.30263 of 2025 06.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis