APHC010314172024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3127/2024 Between: 1. ALLURI JAYAMMA, W/O ALLURI JAYANNA, AGED 75 YEARS, R/0 5-907, ANKIREDDYPALLE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123. 2. MOTAKATLA MARTHAMMA, W/O CHINNA OBAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O 2-122, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123. 3. VANKADHARA SUVARTHA, W/O VANKADHARA CHINNA CHENNAPPA AGED 32 YEARS, R/O 277, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123 4. VANKADHARI CHINNA CHENNAPPA, S/O VANKADHARA YESANNA, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O 277, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123 5. BHTTAJA VENKATA SUBBULU, W/O VENKATA KONDAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O 6- 975, ANKIREDDIPALLI, THUMMALAMENTA, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518213. 6. BATHULA LAKSHMIDEVI, W/O RAMANAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O 5-964 KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123. 7. THAMMOTKA RAMANAMMA, W/O VENKATARAMUDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O 00, ANKIREDDYPALLI,KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123 8. DUDEKULA BALA HUSSENI, S/O USSAINAPPA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/O 1-6, THURPU STREET, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123 9. MOTUKATLA SUJATHA, D/O MOTUKATLA CHINNA OBANNA, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O 2- 122, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123. 10. MOTAKATIA CHINNA OBANNA, S/O KONDAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O 2-122, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123 11. VANKADARA DIVAKAR, S/O PRABHAKAR, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O KALVATALA KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123 12. KASTURI SALMAN, C/O KASTURI SUDHAKAR, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O 3-9, MAIN ROAD, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123 13. MOTAKATIA PEDDAIAH, S/O CHINNA OBANNA, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O 2-122, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123 14. BANDHELA PRABHAKAR, S/O MOHAN, AGED 26 YEARS, R/O 3/15, SC COLONY, BELUM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518122 15. DUDEKULA UPENDRA, S/O AGED 24 YEARS, R/O 1-6, THUPPU STREET, ABDULLAPALEM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123. 16. PALLA SOMASEKHAR, S/O CHINNA VEERAIAH, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O 2-56, ABDULLAPURAM, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518123. 17. BATHHULA LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, W/O CHANDRA SEKHAR, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O 5-858, ANKIREDDYPALLI, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123. 18. VANKADARA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O VANKADARA PRABHAKAR, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O 2-77, KALVATALA, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518123. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SUNITHA BHAI, The Tahsildar of Kolimigundla Mandal, Nandyala District, Andhra Pradesh. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents by invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of court Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 25/01/2024 in WP No. 1605/2024, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as the respondent authorities are interfering with house sites of the petitioners in violation of the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1605 of 2024 this Contempt Case has been filed. The respondents filed counter that they never interfered with the house sites of the petitioners and they had never issued any notice or instructions to the petitioner nor directed them to vacate the sites or stop constructions in the subject land. In view of the contents of the counter, this Contempt Case may be closed recording the contents of the counter. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, recording the submissions made by the respondents that they had never issued any notice nor directed the petitioners either to vacate or stop constructions in the subject site, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR