SMT. BANTI GOGOI PEGU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
WP(C)/8720/2018 · 2025-01-21
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22311 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22311 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010276302018
2025:GAU-AS:621
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8720/2018 SMT. BANTI GOGOI PEGU W/O SRI MANOJ KR. PEGU, R/O PROTECT PELICAN, FLAT NO. 1C, JAPORIGOG ROAD, GANESHGURI, P.S. DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM AND PROPRIETOR OF M/S B.G. BONDED WAREHOUSE, H. NO. C-25 (24), SARUSAJAI LOKHRA, RIGHT SIDE OF N.H. 37, GUWAHATI - 781034. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EXCISE DEPARTMENT AS WELL DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -6, ASSAM 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR
GUWAHATI -6 ASSAM 3:THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI -6 ASSAM 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE
Page No.# 2/3 KAMRUP (METRO)
HAVING ITS OFFICE SITUATED AT O/O DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (METRO) PANBAZAR GUWAHATI -1 ASSAM.
5:THE EXCISE INTELLIGENCE BUREAU (EIB) REP. BY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI -6 ASSAM.
6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI.
7:THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI.
8:THE ADDITINAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R K MOUR, MR. R DUBEY,MR P DAS,MS. A B KAYASTHA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, EXCISE DEPTT., Ms M. Bhattacharjee, G.A, Assam,GA, ASSAM
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 22.01.2025
Mr. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner desires not to press this matter any further and accordingly, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
The above prayer has not been objected by the learned counsels for the respondents.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant