On 17.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case which is apparent as he could not be nabbed despite there being an information received with regard to illegal mining and the police party having reached the spot headed by Sub Inspector. A fact of the matter is that the truck was merely parked at the parking space but later on shown to be at the alleged spot along with sand, which has been done merely as he had supported the rul in the election of Sarpanch. Similarly circumstanced co-accused Jasbir Singh and Palwinder Singh have been granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 01.10.2025. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when investigating agency and will cooperate s Court had passed the following order:- Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has implicated in the case which is apparent as he could not be nabbed despite there being an information received with regard to illegal mining and police party having reached the spot headed by Sub Inspector. A fact of the matter is that the truck was merely parked at the parking space but later on shown to be at the alleged spot along with sand, which has been done merely as he had supported the ruling party in the election of Sarpanch. Similarly circumstanced accused Jasbir Singh and Palwinder Singh have been granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 01.10.2025. He is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 3. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Karnail Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 17.11.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.