Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22302 (AP)

CHOPPARAPU CHANDRASEKHAR v. SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND IAS

CC/3053/2024 · 2025-09-08

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010314712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3053/2024 Between: 1. CHOPPARAPU CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.74-12-8, 1ST FLOOR, FLAT NO. 8, RADHAKRISHNA RESIDENCY, NEAR AUTONAGAR GATE, NEW RTC COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VADAREVU VINAY CHAND IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI T J H PRASAD BABU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI T J H PRASAD BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 22.03.2023 passed in W.P. No. 11139 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.C.No.3053 of 2024 This Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. 2. Today the matter is posted for appearance directing the respondents to comply with the orders of this Court. Respondents furnished written instructions stating that the orders of this Hon’ble Court are complied with. The claim of the petitioner is that orders of this Hon’ble Court in Writ Petition not duly complied with but only partly complied. 3. Since the respondents were directed to furnish instructions showing the bifurcation of the payments made pursuant to the claim of the petitioner, they have submitted written instructions dated 09.09.2025, wherein it is stated that after statutory deductions the entire balance amount of Rs.6,74,459/- was paid to the petitioner. Therefore, the orders of this Court stand complied with and no further orders are required to be passed in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.09.2025 krk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.C.No.3053 of 2024 09.09.2025 krk 379