Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22292 (RAJ)

IMRAN SON OF ASLAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/1821/2025 · 2025-08-07

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30378] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1821/2025 Imran Son Of Aslam, Resident Of Naharthala, Police Station Nau- gava District Alwar Rajasthan (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Sandeep Son Of Ramswaroop, Resident Of Nahar Thala, Naugava District Alwar (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Jamasi, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Dy. G. A. None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 07/08/2025 1. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.03/2023 registered at Police Station Naugava, District- Alwar for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 452 IPC and Section 3(2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (later on offences under Section 429, 143, 341,323, 325, 336, 307, 452 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 3(1) (r) (s), 3 (2) (va), 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to have been made out). 2. Counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is behind the bars since 23.06.2024. Charge sheet has been filed against the appellant. Previous appeal filed by the appellant was [2025:RJ-JP:30378] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-1821/2025] dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 21.10.2024 with liberty to file fresh appeal after recording the statement of injured-Suresh. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the trial Court has recorded the statement of injured-Suresh in which he has not levelled any specific allegation against the appellant. He levelled the allegation against Aslam and Hasim. Aslam is not accused in the case. Hasim has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and conclusion of trial may take long time. 4. Learned Dy. G. A. has opposed the appeal. 5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be just and expedient to order the release of the appellant on bail. 6. This appeal is accordingly allowed and the order dated 26.05.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Alwar is quashed and set-aside. It is directed that accused appellant- Imran S/o Aslam shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/4