- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1203 WP No. 10236 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. T.P.PRAVEEN S/O T.PICHUMANI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.1300, JAYAKRUPA, 6TH CROSS ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 2ND PHASE, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE HOTEL INDUSTRISLISTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REGD OFFICE, "SAHAKARA SOURABHA", NO.234, 2ND CROSS, 4TH MAIN, CHAMARAJAPET, BANGALORE-560 019. REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1203 WP No. 10236 of 2020 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 23.09.2023, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2