Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22284 (AP)

SMT JILLIDIMUDI VIJAYA LAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16012/2025 · 2025-07-01

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.16012_2025 APHC010314442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16012/2025 Between: 1. SMT JILLIDIMUDI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS D.NO.11-2-9, ASAPUVEEDHI, NEAR OLD BUS STAND VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. JILLIDIMUDI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. TATAYALU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS D.NO. 11-2-9, ASAPUVEEDHI, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NEAR APSP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, AT VIZIANAGARAM 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 5. MANEM NIRMALA RUBY, W/O. MANEM RAMALAKSHMI RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R.H. COLONY, MADHURAVADA, GREATER 2 HN, J W.P.No.16012_2025 VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one like WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent No.4 is involve in civil disputes and threatening the petitioners to vacate and dispossess the house bearing D.No. 11-12-3, Asapuveedhi, Vizianagaram Town and Mandal, Vizianagaram District and not to dispossess the petitioners and Respondents No.1 to 2 not providing police protection to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct Respondent No.4 not to involve in civil disputes and not to threaten the petitioners to vacate the house bearing D.No.11-12-3, Asapuveedhi, Vizianagaram Town and Mandal, Vizianagaram District and not to dispossess the petitioners and also provide necessary police protection to petitioners till pending disposal of the W.P and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct Respondent No.4 not to involve in civil disputes and not to threaten the petitioners to vacate the house bearing D.No.11-12-3, Asapuveedhi, Vizianagaram Town and Mandal, Vizianagaram District and not to dispossess the petitioners and also provide necessary police protection to petitioners till pending disposal of the W.P and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B.SUDHAKAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 HN, J W.P.No.16012_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent at behest of the 5th respondent repeatedly calling the petitioners to the Police Station and interfering in civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent No.5. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the 5th respondent’s husband had filed a complaint against the petitioners and that the Police in order to conduct preliminary enquiry, called the petitioners to the Police Station. However, the 1st petitioner informs that she was suffering from ill health and did not attend the Police Station. However, she sent her husband i.e., the 2nd petitioner to the Police Station. It is also submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that after the preliminary enquiry, the Police have closed the grievance received from the husband of the 5th respondent, as civil in nature. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 02.07.2025 JLV 4 HN, J W.P.No.16012_2025 182 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.16012 of 2025 Date: 02.07.2025 JLV