APHC010314042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18025 OF 2025 Between: Billa Mallideva Rao, S/o. Veeraiah aged about 66 years, Occ- Daily Labour R/o. Jammulapalem Village, Tangutur Mandal, Prakasham District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 2. The District Collector, Prakasham District, Ongole, A.P. 3. The Tahasildar, Kothapatnam Mandal, Prakasham District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the written representation, dated 28-04-2025 made by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the written representation dated 28-04-2025 made by the petitioner 1 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the written representation dated 28- 04- 2025made by the petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTIPALLI PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010314042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18025/2025 Between; 1.BILLA MALLIDEVARAO, S/0. VEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC- DAILY LABOUR R/0. JAMMULAPALEM VILLAGE, TANGUTUR MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE A.P. KOTHAPATNAM MANDAL, PRAKASHAM 3.THE TAHASILDAR, DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the written representation, dated 28- 04-2025 made by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the written representation dated 28-04-2025 made by the petitioner and pass more 2 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the written representation dated 28-04- 2025made by the petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KOTIPALLI PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri V.Chetan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri K.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 to 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 2 and 3 are not considering the representation dated 28.04.2025 made by the petitioner. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner made a representation dated 28.04.2025 (Ex.P.1) requesting the respondent authorities to issue a Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed in respect of Ac.0-37 cents in Sy.No.549-3 of Madanur Village, Kothapatnam Mandal, Prakasam District. However, the respondent authorities have not acted upon the said representation. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on oral instructions, would submit that the petitioner has to make an application under Form VIA as per Rules 18 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Lands and Pattadar Pass Book Rules, 1989 (for short “the Rules”) made under Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1977 (for short “the Act”) by annexing all the relevant document through online. If the petitioner makes such an 4. 3 application, the 3'"^ respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate orders. r In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will make an application under Form VIA as per the Rules. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, giving liberty to the petitioner to make an application through online under Form VIA as per Rules by annexing all the relevant documents. Thereafter, the learned 3'"' respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders strictly as per the law. No order as to costs. 5. 6. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- Wl- SRl^”!VAS assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// \ SECTI To, Revenue of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh 1. The Principal Secretary, State Department, Secretariat District Collector, Prakasham District, Ongole, A.P. 2. The 3. The Tahasildar, Kothapatnam 4. One CC to SRI 5. Two CCs to GP Mandal, Prakasham District KOTIPALLI PAVAN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] FOR REVENUE High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 18/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18025 OF 2025 I 31) AUG 2025 g Current Section . DISPOSING THE WP AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS