Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2228 (KAR)

BIOGENETIC DRUGS PRIVATE LIMITED v. KARNATAKA STATE MEDICAL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED

WP/25026/2025 · 2026-06-09

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47107 WP No. 25026 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH WRIT PETITION NO.25026 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: BIOGENETIC DRUGS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.66, MATHUR VAISHYA NAGAR, TONK ROAD, JAIPUR-302 011. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. PUSHKAR DEO. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PIYUSH KUMAR JAIN D., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: KARNATAKA STATE MEDICAL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 1. DR. SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD, KHB COLONY, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 079. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SUMANA BALIGA M., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER OF Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47107 WP No. 25026 of 2025 BLACKLISTING DATED MARCH 28, 2025, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT WHEREBY THE RESPONDENT BLACKLISTED 20.1.20 FERROUS SALTS(A) + FOLIC ACID (B) 45 MG ELEMENTAL IRON (A) + 400 MCG (B) PINK TABLET 45MG + 400MCG 1X10X10 (FOR BREVITY, DRUG) MANUFACTURED AND SUPPLIED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN, FOR A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS, VIDE ORDER DATED MARCH 28, 2025 (IMPUGNED ORDER), VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B- GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH ORAL ORDER Even though the case has been taken up in revised round, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE NS CT:TSM List No.: 38 Sl No.: 46