DUNGARMAL ACHARYA ALIAS VICKY S/O GAJRAJ ACHARYA v. STATE OF RAJSTHAN
CRLMB/8008/2025 · 2025-06-27
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22279 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22279 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23708] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8008/2025 Dungarmal Acharya @ Vicky S/o Gajraj Acharya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jodhpur Chowki, Current Balaji, Merta, Nagaur, Police Station Merta City, District Nagaur (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner is in Judicial Custody in District Jail, Ajmer). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajsthan, through the Public Prosecutor ----Non-Petitioner
2. Anil Chouhan S/o Shri Chandra Prakash, aged about 35 years, R/o Near Prabhu Ji Ki Bagiya, Masuda Road, Beawar City, Beawar. ----Complainant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Loknath Acharya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V.J.)
Order 27/06/2025
1. Instant bail application has been filed by accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.03/2025 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(3), 308(2) & 356(2) of B.N.S.,
2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is falsely been implicated in the present case; petitioner is in custody since 22.05.2025; charge-sheet has been filed and a compromise has been entered into between the father of the accused-petitioner and the complainant on 30.05.2025, therefore, in such circumstances, petitioner be given benefit of bail.
3.
Learned counsel for the complainant has no objection to release the accused-petitioner on bail.
[2025:RJ-JP:23708] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8008/2025]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Having considered the nature of allegations against the accused-petitioner is to extort the money and jewellery from the complainant and victim on the pretext of entering into marriage; Complainant has no objection to release the accused-petitioner on bail; Investigation has already been completed, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dungarmal Acharya @ Vicky S/o Gajraj Acharya shall be released on bail provided him furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SUDESH BANSAL ( V.J.)),J DAKSH/119