Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:18664
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 403 of 2020 Chamruram Yadav S/o Anand Ram Yadav Aged About 55 Years R/o Dokrabhatha, Tahsil- Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. Smt. Kumaru Bai Wido/o Baidhnath Mahobiya Aged About 63 Years R/o Baraipara Chhuikhadan, Tahsil- Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
2. Vidhyakant S/o Late Baidhnath Mahobiya Aged About 39 Years R/o Baraipara Chhuikhadan, Tahsil- Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Dansena, Advocate For Respondent No. 3/ State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 24-04-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that civil suit filed by the petitioner was dismissed according to the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11(B) of CPC. 2) On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that dismissal of a suit according to the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11(B) of CPC is a Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.24 18:14:34 +0530
2 deemed decree and appeal would lie against such order. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Shadangi, in the opinion of this Court, present petition is not maintainable. Consequently, this petition is hereby dismissed. However, petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to law. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya