RAMZAN ANSARI ALIAS MD RAMZAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6055/2024 · 2025-05-06
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22274 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22274 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13571
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6055 of 2024
1. Ramzan Ansari @ Md. Ramzan Ansari, aged about 40 years, s/o Mumtaz Ansari
2. Amir Hussain, aged about 35 years, s/o Md. Mumtaz Ansari
3. Shakil Ansari @ Md. Shakil Ansari, aged about 29 years, s/o Mumtaz Ansari
4. Mojjamil @ Mujjamil Ansari, aged about 21 years, s/o Mumtaz Ansari
5. Jahangir Ansari, aged about 35 years, s/o Kudrat Ansari All are residents of village Kendua, PO Lalmatiya, PS Lalmatiya, Dist. Godda
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh Advocate.
For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, APP
-----
04/06.05.2025:
Learned counsel for the petitioners after going through the counter- affidavit submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted and the offences which are registered is baliable in nature.
Considering his submission, I am of the opinion that the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.
Accordingly, the same is dismissed as not maintainable.
(ANANDA SEN, J. ) anjali/cp3