- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16690 CRL.P No. 4783 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4783 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SANJAY M M SON OF MANOHAR V AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, ARYA VAISHYA VAIDIKA BHAVANA BEHIND KANNIKA PARAMESHWARI TEMPLE, MALLESHWARAM, 8TH CROSS, BENGALURU 560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI VINAY V SON OF C.V. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO549/1, 3RD MAIN, 13TH MAIN, RESIDENT OF 1ST MAIN, K.T.J. NAGARA, DAVANAGERE-577 002. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASHING OF THE ORDER DATED 17.01.2025, ON THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 311 OF CR.P.C. PASSSED BY THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT DAVANAGERE IN C.C.NO.3714 OF 2021 THERE BY DIRECTING THE TRIAL COURT TO PASS AN ORDER FOR RECALLING PW-1 FOR CROSS EXAMINATION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16690 CRL.P No. 4783 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Trial Court, wherein the application filed under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to recall PW-1 for cross-examination was rejected. 2. The petitioner is being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the examination-in-chief of PW-1 (the complainant), the matter was set down for cross- examination. However, the petitioner did not choose to cross-examine PW-1 without assigning any valid reason, prompting the Trial Court to post the matter for final arguments. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application to recall PW-1 for cross-examination. The said application was rejected on the ground that it was filed to protract the proceedings. If the petitioner is not allowed to cross-examine PW-1, the testimony of PW-1 remains uncontroverted, which could potentially result in the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. To ensure a fair trial, as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it would be appropriate to provide one more opportunity to the petitioner to cross-examine PW-1. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16690 CRL.P No. 4783 of 2025 3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 17.01.2025 passed on the application filed under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. in C.C. No. 3714/2021 by the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere, is hereby quashed, and the application is allowed. 4. The petitioner is permitted to cross-examine PW-1 on the date on which he is summoned, failing which the Trial Court shall proceed in accordance with law. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 137