Saketi Durga Prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/6460/2025 · 2025-07-20
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22270 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22270 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
+t` <\ '-`\_\. `* ':`` IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO IANo.1 OF2025 IN CRLP NO: 6460 OF 2025 Between : Saketi Durga Prasad, S/o. Narasimha Raju, aged about 22 years, R/o. Goyindamma colony, AnkampaI6.in:village, Chodavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, A.P. ..Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh ."Respondent Petition under section 528 of BNSS (Old Provision under Section 482 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the b6ti''tion, the High Court may be pleased to modify the order passed in CRLP No.6460/2025 dated 21.07.2025 by considering the situation of the petitioner/Accused No.1 astlpetitioner/Al shall be released om bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-with single surety for a like sum each to theJ §atl-sfaction of the Hon'b[e II AddI. Chief Judicial Magistrate, visakhapatnam" instead of {[petitioner/Al to be releasec! on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000,'- with two sureties anal Permit the PetI-tiOner/Accused Ne.1 to deposit the surety bond amount of Rs.10,OOO/- with single surety instead of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties, Pending disposal of CRLP No.6460 of 2025, on the file of the Hl-gh Court.
I/ \ t The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof `and the order of the High Court dated 21.07.2025 made in CrIP.No.6460 of 2025 and upon hearing the arguments of sri pulapalli Babji, Advocate for th6-`petitioner and of public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, Court made the folloivi:hd I .:-,_) l6
ORDER: ff Heard the learned coums;I for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petitionJ ``the COnditiOn imposed On the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 in CrI.P.No.6460 of 2025 dateci 21.07.2025 that they shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/-each with two sureties for a like sum reJach to the satisfaction of the learned [! Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, is hereby modifieci as follows: The petitioners/Accused Mos.1 and 2 herein shall be released on their executing a personal bon''di: for Rs.10,000/I each with one suretly each for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned ll Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. Accordingly, the I.A.No.1-of 2025 is allowed." //TRLFE COPY// A sD/-N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANifeG ISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ToJ
1. The I Additional District &`S-essions Judge-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act,'Visakhapatnam.
2. The ll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam
_+
3. The SuperI-ntenden{, Central Jail, VI-Sakhapatnam.
4. The Station House offl-ce_r, lI Town Police Station, visakhapatnam District. :i i' ,,.``...
5. One CC to Sri. Pulapalli Babji, Advocate [opuc]
6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT]
7. One spare copy CVSS \ ` l` -.. I- -\ . I .I . I-.I.¢ r |.,| '.\J..I - I)+_,_. i._
HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J DATED : 22/08/2025
ORDER IANo.1 OF2025 IN CRLP NO: 6460 OF 2025 DIRECTION -_,1?5ii