- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1497 WP No. 10716 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10716 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: NEHA PARMAR D/O SATYENDER SINGH, AGED 27 YEARS, R/A VENKATESHWARA LADIES P.G, BYRASANDRA EXTENSION, BAYARAPA LAYOUT, SUDDAGUNTAPALYA, C.V.RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 093. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVAPRASAD., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIVAMANITHAN.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY. 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. BAIYAPPANAHALLI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEAR, GOPALAN SIGNATURE MALL, SWAMY VIVEKANANDA ROAD, RAHATBAGH, NAGAVARAPALYA, BENNIGANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 093. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1497 WP No. 10716 of 2021 4. SATYENDER SINGH S/O RAJPAL SINGH, AGEDA BOUT 49 YEARS, R/A 15, SHREE RAM TENAMENT, SHREE RAM CHOWK, NAVA NARODA, OPPOSITE MEWADA PARTY PLOT, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT-382 330. 5. CHUNA BHATTI POLICE STATION, AMALTAS PHASE-3, CHUNA BHATTI, BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH-462 016. 6. KRISHNANAGAR POLICE STATION, AVADHPURI SOCIETY, MAKARPURA, GIDC NARODA, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT-382 345. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO 3; SRI. VARUN.M.R., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Basavaprasad., counsel on behalf of Sri.Sivamanithan.S., for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 have appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1497 WP No. 10716 of 2021 Smt.Neha Parmar., - petitioner is physically present before the Court and she has been duly identified by her counsel. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking certain reliefs. 3. Smt.Neha Parmar., - petitioner submits that as of today there is no threat by the fourth respondent. However, she apprehends threat in future. The apprehension about future threat cannot be predicted as of today and the same cannot be addressed as of today. Taking note of the submission of the petitioner that there is no threat as of today, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. 4. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18