Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22259 (KAR)

INGLEBY PUB AND BREWERRY PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9403/2025 · 2025-04-08

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14931 WP No. 9403 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 9403 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. INGLEBY PUB AND BREWERRY PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.C-14, 1ST FLOOR, NO. 131, NEW NO. 132/11, DEVATHA PLAZA, RESIDENCY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 025 AND ITS UNIT AT NO. 125, IBBANIVALAVADI VILLAGE, MADIKERI TALUK, MYSORE ROAD, BOIKERI POST MADIKERI - 571 201 KODAGU DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.SEBASTIAN DEVASSY 2. MR. SEBASTIAN DEVASSY DIRECTOR/ SHARE-HOLDER SON OF LATE MR. VERGHESE, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT PERUMPULLYKADAN HOUSE, CHETTIKULAM, KOZHIKODE - 673 303 … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JOSHUA HUDSON SAMUEL., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14931 WP No. 9403 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, M.S. BUILDING. BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. MADIKERI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MUDA) NEAR KSRTC BUS DEPOT, MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI NAGENDRA NAIK R., ADVOCATE FOR R2) *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER AND GRANT SANCTION AS SOUGHT FOR BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER THE APPLICATION DATED 05.07.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, WITHIN A PERIOD OF THIRTY (30) DAYS AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14931 WP No. 9403 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present petition has been filed seeking for a direction in the nature of mandamus to respondent No.2 to consider and grant sanction as sought for by the petitioners in terms of the application at Annexure-A. 2. It is the case made out on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners had filed an application before the respondents seeking approval of plan for construction of a building in the property bearing Sy. No.63/10 of Ibnivalavadi Village, Madikeri Taluk, Kodagu District. 3. It is submitted that though all documents have been furnished, no decision has been taken by the respondents. It is further submitted that application is made on 05.07.2024 and till date, no decision has been taken. 4. Sri. Nagendra Naik, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that application at - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:14931 WP No. 9403 of 2025 Annexure-A will be disposed off at the earliest within a period not later than 30 days from today. 5. Petitioner to appear before the 2nd respondent within two weeks from today and the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the application at Annexure-A as is permissible under law. Needless to state the petitioner is to furnish necessary clarifications or documents as may be required to enable the Authorities to dispose off the application at Annexure-A. 6. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP