Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:27689
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 150 of 2025 1 - Inderbhushan Shukla S/o Shri Taradin Shukla Aged About 68 Years R/o Main Road, Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - Tarkeshwar Shukla S/o Shri Taradin Shukla Aged About 61 Years R/o Main Road, Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Lokesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Maheshwari Kumar Soni Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. 1634, New Kashi Nagar, Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh 4 - The Tahsildar Korba, Dist - Korba Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Dist. - Raipur Chhattisgarh JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.06.26 10:27:36 +0530
2
... Respondent(s) For Applicants(s) : None For State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Addl A.G.
Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board 25/06/2025
1. The applicants (respondent No. 5 & 6 in WPC No. 647 of 2025) seek review of the order dated 31.01.2025 passed in WPC No. 647 of 2025.
2. Perusal of the record would show that WPC No. 647 of 2025 was
disposed off by this court on 31.01.2025 with a direction to the Tehsildar to conclude the proceedings within a period of 60 days in accordance with law.
3. The review petitioners filed the present review with the contention that the authorities of the revenue department are not providing opportunity of hearing to them and the Tehsildar/ revenue authorities have stated that there is no direction/ order of the High court to grant opportunity of hearing to the parties and there is only a direction to conclude the proceedings.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that in the revenue proceedings, if the review petitioners are party the said proceedings must be completed after affording due opportunity of hearing to them and if the proceedings are still pending before the Tehsildar and the review petitioners are party to the said
3 proceedings, the same will be concluded only after affording due opportunity of hearing to them.
5. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel appearing for the State, the review petition is disposed off. Sd/-d/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE Gowri/Jyoti